Skip to main content
· 5/27/1992

Celotex Corp. v. Wilson

Citations

  • 607 A.2d 1223
  • 1992 Del. LEXIS 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sustaining jury charge allowing damages for asbestosis claimants’ fear of cancer
  • applying the United States v. Gregory analysis to the Delaware Jury Act
  • sustaining jury charge allowing damages for asbestosis claimants’ fear of cancer
  • ex parte response to single question without specific judicial finding as to undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, or public necessity was contrary to Delaware Jury Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Moore, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.