Celotex Corp. v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deportable aliens “possess a substantive due process right to liberty during deportation hearings”
• concluding that detention pending removal for more than eight years did not violate substantive due process rights
• concluding that the alien’s “litigation strategy [was] perfectly permissible” but that he could “not rely on the extra time resulting therefore to claim that his prolonged detention violates substantive due process’
• concluding that the alien’s “litigation strategy [was] perfectly permissible,” but he 25 could “not rely on the extra time resulting therefrom to claim that his prolonged detention violates substantive due process”
• concluding that the alien’s “litigation strategy [was] perfectly permissible” but that he could “not rely on the extra time resulting therefore to claim that his prolonged detention violates substantive due process”
• concluding that the alien’s “litigation strategy [was] perfectly permissible” but that he could “not rely on the extra time resulting therefore to claim that his prolonged detention violates substantive due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).