Celotex Corp. v. Auten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the industrial commissioner could not apportion benefits without a statute authorizing him to do so; therefore, the full responsibility rule was applicable
• holding the industrial commissioner could not apportion benefits without a statute authorizing him to do so; therefore, the full responsibility rule was applicable
• characterizing section 85.34(3) as providing that the “employer [is] entitled to credit for permanent partial disability payments made where employee sustains permanent partial disability and permanent total disability arising from same injury”
• characterizing section 85.34(3) as providing that the “employer [is] entitled to credit for permanent partial disability payments made where employee sustains permanent partial disability and permanent total disability arising from same injury”
• successive injuries with same employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).