Skip to main content
· 4/9/1888

Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Russell

Citations

  • 35 F. 17
  • 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where plaintiff sought to enjoin enforcement of statute making certain machines illegal gambling devices and subject to seizure and destruction, court found no due process right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lacombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.