Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The FTA does not abrogate local zoning authority in favor of a commercial desire to offer optimal service to customers.
• the court’s task is to determine “whether the decision, as guided by local law, is supported by substantial evidence”
• the court’s task is to determine “whether the decision, as guided by local law, is supported by substantial evidence”
• local zoning decisions have the effect of prohibiting wireless communication services if they result in significant gaps in service within the jurisdiction
• The FTA does not abrogate local zoning authority in favor of a commercial desire to offer optimal service to customers.
• The Act expressly preserves local zoning authority over the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).