Cellnet Communications, Inc. v. New Par

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if “monetary damages are difficult to calculate” this does not mean that “the injury is irreparable”
• “As the Court will deny the motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court does not need to address the issue of a security pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
• “As the Court will deny the motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court does not need to address the issue of a security pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”’
• “It appears that no third party would be substantially harmed by the issuance of a preliminary injunction in this matter. If an injunction issued, cellular service to customers would continue and would be unaffected by the injunction.”
• “It appears that no third party would be substantially harmed by the issuance of a preliminary injunction in this matter. If an injunction issued, cellular service to customers would continue and would be unaffected by the injunction.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).