· 12/4/2012
Cellco Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission
Citations
- 403 U.S. App. D.C. 105
- 700 F.3d 534
- 57 Communications Reg. (P&F) 135
- 2012 WL 6013416
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the FCC must “moor[] its action to a distinct grant of authority” from Congress
- characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
- characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
- characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
- characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
- “[M]obile-data providers are statutorily immune, perhaps twice over, from treatment as common carriers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Garland, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.