Skip to main content
· 12/4/2012

Cellco Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission

Citations

  • 403 U.S. App. D.C. 105
  • 700 F.3d 534
  • 57 Communications Reg. (P&F) 135
  • 2012 WL 6013416
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the FCC must “moor[] its action to a distinct grant of authority” from Congress
  • characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
  • characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
  • characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
  • characterizing the “just and reasonable” standard as being that “applicable to common carriers”
  • “[M]obile-data providers are statutorily immune, perhaps twice over, from treatment as common carriers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Garland, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.