Skip to main content
· 4/15/1834

Celis v. Oriol

Citations

  • 6 La. 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that employer’s arguments about performance issues are unrelated to employee’s disability and thus are irrelevant to whether plaintiff could establish prima facie case
  • noting an employee would be the cause of the breakdown if she “either refused or failed to provide relevant medical information”
  • denying summary judgment because a genuine issue existed about who was responsible for the failure of the interactive process in part because there was evidence that the employer had already decided to fire plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.