· 4/15/1834
Celis v. Oriol
Citations
- 6 La. 403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that employer’s arguments about performance issues are unrelated to employee’s disability and thus are irrelevant to whether plaintiff could establish prima facie case
- noting an employee would be the cause of the breakdown if she “either refused or failed to provide relevant medical information”
- denying summary judgment because a genuine issue existed about who was responsible for the failure of the interactive process in part because there was evidence that the employer had already decided to fire plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.