Skip to main content
· 7/6/2015

Celgard, LLC v. Sk Innovation Co., Ltd.

Citations

  • 792 F.3d 1373
  • 115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1569
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11536
  • 2015 WL 4068810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to “establish jurisdiction under an agency theory,” plaintiffs must “show that the defendant exercises control over the activities of the third-party”
  • stating that the preponderance standard applies when parties have conducted jurisdictional discovery and jurisdictional facts are not in dispute
  • finding no personal jurisdiction through purposeful availment for plaintiff's failure to show facts that offers for sale were made to residents of the forum state
  • explaining the second required'prong of the specific jurisdiction test of whether the claim arises out of or relates to1 the defendant’s activities with the forum state
  • requiring prima facie showing when determining personal jurisdiction after jurisdictional discovery but without the benefit of a jurisdictional hearing
  • requiring prima facie showing when determining personal jurisdiction after jurisdictional discovery but without the benefit of a jurisdictional hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Reyna, Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.