Celestine BROWN, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “lack of significant medical restrictions [is] inconsistent with . .. complaints of disabling pain”
• holding that a claimant's failure to comply with prescribed medical treatment and a lack of significant medical restrictions is inconsistent with complaints of a disabling pain
• noting that a “lack of significant medical restrictions [is] inconsistent with ... complaints of disabling pain” (citing Smith v. Shalala, 987 F.2d 1371, 1374 (8th Cir. 1993))
• noting that a “lack of significant medical restrictions [is] inconsistent with ... complaints of disabling pain”
• finding that lack of restrictions by treating physician supported ALJ’s determination that the plaintiff did not qualify as disabled
• noting that a “lack of significant medical restrictions [is] inconsistent with ... complaints of disabling pain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).