Indiana Supreme Court· 5/1/2000
Celebration Fireworks, Inc. v. Smith
Citations
- 727 N.E.2d 450
- 2000 Ind. LEXIS 409
- 2000 WL 530329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that courts should not “easily declare[]” employees acting outside the scope of employment because then “claimants would more often find themselves limited to recovery against the private assets of employees rather than those of governments.”
- reasoning that acts incidental to authorized conduct can fall within the scope of employment, provided that such act “is subordinate to or pertinent to an act which the servant is employed to perform” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
- “Even tortious acts may fall within the scope of employment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker, Dickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bushong v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-06-27· cited 173×
- King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-06-27· cited 107×
- Kelley v. TanoosIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 85×
- Stacy Knighten v. East Chicago Housing Authority, Individually and d/b/a West Calumet Complex, Davis Security Service, LLC, and Donnell CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-12-08· cited 56×
- Judy Chang v. Purdue University, The Trustees of Purdue University Dr. France A. Cordova, President of Purdue University (in her official capacity)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-03-19· cited 51×
- Cody Waldrip v. Angela Waldrip, City of Bloomington, Indiana, Monroe County, Indiana, State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 51×
- Harness v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-03-25· cited 48×
- Smith v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-10· cited 44×
- Noble County v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-27· cited 39×
- Walgreen Co. v. Abigail E. HinchyIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 34×
- Jason T. Myers v. Thomas D. Maxson Amy L. Hutchison Bruce W. Graham and Trueblood & Graham (In their Official and Individual Capacities) (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-03-29· cited 22×
- Ellis v. City of MartinsvilleIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-01-11· cited 22×
- City of Anderson v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-02-21· cited 21×
- Fowler v. BrewerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-20· cited 21×
- Toni Ball v. Clifton JonesIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-03-17· cited 12×
- Sandage v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-05· cited 10×
- Ingram v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-12-18· cited 9×
- Wilson v. IsaacsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-12-15· cited 8×
- Thomas Hudgins and Sheila Hudgins v. Brian Bemish, Ideal Heating Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-12-09· cited 7×
- Long v. BarrettIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-10· cited 6×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-12-05· cited 149×
- Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-11-24· cited 64×
- Quakenbush v. LackeyIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-25· cited 62×
- Foster v. PearcyIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 59×
- Indiana Department of Correction v. StaggIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-07-18· cited 50×
- Kemezy v. PetersIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-25· cited 48×
- VanValkenburg v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-11-16· cited 42×
- Poole v. ClaseIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 38×
- Celebration Fireworks, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-07-10· cited 1×
Other cases named Celebration Fireworks, Inc. v. Smith
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.