· 3/21/1983
Cegielski v. Wisconsin
Citations
- 460 U.S. 1043
- 103 S. Ct. 1439
- 75 L. Ed. 2d 796
- 51 U.S.L.W. 3685
- 1983 U.S. LEXIS 4223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plaintiffs’ failure to assert state constitutional claims can only be attributable to a tactical decision to assert only a federal constitutional claim. Courts will deny a motion to amend where the movant’s unexplained delay suggests bad faith or tactical design.”
- “Plaintiffs’ failure to assert state constitutional claims can only be attributable to a tactical decision to assert only a federal constitutional claim. Courts will deny a motion to amend where the movant’s unexplained delay suggests bad faith or tactical design.”
- “Plaintiffs’ failure to assert state constitutional claims can only be attributable to a tactical decision to assert only a federal constitutional claim. Courts will deny a motion to amend where the movant’s unexplained delay suggests bad faith or tactical design.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.