Cedyco Corp. v. PetroQuest Energy, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the inclusion of words such as ‘if,’ ‘provided,’ ‘on condition that,’ or some similar phrase of conditional language indicate that the parties intended there to be a condition precedent” (internal marks and citation omitted)
• noting that “the inclusion of words such as ‘if,’ ‘provided,’ ‘on condition that,’ or some similar phrase of conditional language indicate that the parties intended there to be a condition precedent” (internal marks and citation omitted)
• offering to sell a working interest in two oil wells “subject to a[ ] consent to assign” by the original lessee made the consent of the lessee a condition precedent to the formation of a contract under Texas law
• “[W]e must ensure that each provision of the contract is given effect and none are rendered meaningless”.
• “[T]he inclusion of words such as ‘if,’ ‘provided,’ ‘on condition that,’ or some similar phrase of conditional language indicate that the parties intended there to be a condition precedent.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).