Skip to main content
· 4/1/1977

Cedeck v. Hamiltonian Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Citations

  • 551 F.2d 1136
  • 14 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1571
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14014
  • 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 11,593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • leaving it to district court to decide whether appel-lee employers could obtain refund of contributions made to pension plan on their behalf
  • “In actions to enforce benefit rights of pension plans covered by ERISA federal substantive law controls.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Smith, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.