Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. National League of Postmasters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying rule 12(b)(1) when reviewing motion to dismiss asserting preemption defense
• applying rule 12(b)(1) when reviewing motion to dismiss asserting preemption defense
• applying rule 12(b)(1) when reviewing motion to dismiss asserting preemption defense
• “Neither party contends that Cedars-Sinai has S.M.'s specific written consent to pursue payment of a disputed claim.”
• “federal law must both (1) provide remedies that displace state law remedies (displacement of remedies) and (2) conflict with state law (conflict preemption).”
• “FEHBA’s implementing regulations establish a mandatory administrative remedy that is available to a party who believes that a carrier has wrongfully denied benefits. OPM’s finding may be challenged in federal court, but only after exhaustion of this process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).