Skip to main content
· 9/28/2017

Cedar Creek Mall Properties, L.L.C. v. Krone

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 7884

Syllabus

Theft embezzlement conversion summary judgment discovery requests motion for relief from judgment prejudgment attachment pro se litigant. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to plaintiff corporation in this theft/embezzlement and conversion case. Defendant, who was imprisoned and acting pro se throughout these proceedings, offered no evidence to show that a material fact was at issue. The court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's second motion for discovery. The court granted defendant additional time to complete discovery and notified her that she needed to follow the rules of civil procedure. Nonetheless, defendant failed to send any discovery requests to plaintiff. This court lacks jurisdiction to review defendant's motion for relief from judgment, as it was filed after her notice of appeal and is not properly before this court. The trial court did not err in granting plaintiff's motion for prejudgment interest.

Judges: Blackmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.