CECIL TOLBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicat- ing that expert testimony is not required for the Board to make factual findings based on its view of the record
• indicat- ing that expert testimony is not required for the Board to make factual findings based on its view of the record
• “[I]n every case, it remains the Board’s essential function to make factual findings based on its view of the record.”
• “the burden of proving invalidity in an IPR re- mains on the petitioner throughout the proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).