Skip to main content
· 1/27/1984

Cecil D. Slayton v. David Willingham, Larry Hignight, Bill Cully, City of Ardmore, Oklahoma

Citations

  • 726 F.2d 631
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whether plaintiff had a privacy interest in personal photographs would depend on whether \he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the photos\
  • noting possible effect of Whalen and Nixon on plaintiff's claim based on \disclosure of personal matters rather than mere damage to his reputation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seth, McKay, Logan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.