Ce Distribution, LLC v. New Sensor Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mere plurality of factors demonstrates that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant is reasonable
• holding that it is “reasonable to infer” that the defendant knew its actions “would resonate in Arizona” because it knew that plaintiff was based in Arizona
• noting that this factor favors jurisdiction when there is no evidence to indicate conflicts with another state’s sovereignty
• holding plaintiff showed 10 sufficient facts for personal jurisdiction based on the defendant’s intention to undermine 11 plaintiff’s business ventures in the forum state
• specific jurisdiction over tortious interference claim exists where defendant committed intentional acts outside of the forum with knowledge that the harm would be suffered in the forum
• “The forum 22 state has a substantial interest in adjudicating the dispute of one of its residents who alleges 23 injury due to the tortious conduct of another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).