Skip to main content
· 5/29/2009

CDI Energy Services, Inc. v. West River Pumps, Inc.

Citations

  • 567 F.3d 398
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 283
  • 91 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1045
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11649
  • 2009 WL 1491518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that harm resulting from loss of customers could be remedied through damages
  • concluding that harm resulting from loss of customers could be remedied through damages
  • explaining “the absence of a likelihood of success on the merits strongly suggests that preliminary injunctive relief should be denied”
  • upholding district court decision denying preliminary injunction where the “wrongful appropriation of [the plaintiff’s] clients . . . [was] already carried out,” and court “did not want to order (and lacked the authority to order
  • irreparable harm factor weighed against preliminary injunction because the harm “to a large extent, ha[d] already occurred.”
  • harm resulting from loss of customers could be remedied through damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Bowman, and Smith, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.