Skip to main content
· 9/23/2005

Cd Partners, LLC v. Grizzle

Citations

  • 424 F.3d 795
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the close relationship test allowed three corporate officers to compel arbitration under an arbitration agreement to which their corporation was a signatory
  • discussing when a nonsignatory can enforce an arbitration clause without referencing any particular state's law
  • noting that a nonsignatory can force a signatory into arbitration “when the relationship of the persons, wrongs and issues involved is a close one” and, here “the core of the dispute is the conduct of the three nonsig natories in fulfilling signatory CDWI’s promises”
  • permitting a nonsignatory to enforce an arbitration clause under alternative estoppel
  • arbitration compelled where franchisee’s claims arose directly out of and related to its operation of franchises under agreement containing arbitration clause
  • “Broadly worded arbitration clauses ... are generally construed to cover tort suits arising from the same set of operative facts covered by a contract between the parties to the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.