cc/devas (Mauritius) Ltd v. Republic of India

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e consider the jury charge as a whole, looking for the interpretation a reasonable juror would place on the judge’s words” [quotations and citation omitted]
• instruction that \jurors' collective memory should control\ mitigated prosecutor's error in closing argument
• In a prosecutor’s closing argument, ‘“while the statement should not have been made, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial. . . . Again, there was no objection by the defendant’s trial counsel, suggesting that the tone of the remark was not a call to arms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).