Cc Distributors, Inc. And Whitman Distributing Company v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a plaintiff suffers a constitutionally cognizable injury by the loss of an opportunity to pursue a benefit”
• explaining that whether a plaintiff is certain to receive the benefit may be “relevant to the merits,” but “carries no force against [a] plaintiffs’ allegation of injury”
• finding standing when the plaintiff alleged that the Department was legally required to offer the opportunity to compete for supply contracts
• remanding a case to the district court because remand “would give the district court the benefit of the parties’ arguments concerning” the relevant regulations “and thereby facilitate the proper disposition of plaintiffs’ claim”
• stating that a party “suffers a constitutionally cognizable injury by the loss of an opportunity to pursue a benefit ... even though the [party] may not be able to show that it was certain to receive that benefit had it been accorded the lost opportunity”
• stating that a party “suffers a constitutionally cognizable injury by the loss of an opportunity to purse a benefit . . . even though the [party] may not be able to show that it was certain to receive that benefit had it been accorded the lost opportunity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).