Skip to main content
· 11/19/1996

CC-California Plaza Associates v. Paller & Goldstein

Citations

  • 51 Cal. App. 4th 1042
  • 59 Cal. Rptr. 2d 382
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 15261
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9294
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • effect of amended judgment on appeal time depends on whether amendment substantially changes judgment or simply corrects clerical error; here error in identity of losing party deemed substantial change thus started new time for appeal
  • amendment substantially changing form of judgment starts new time for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haerle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.