Cbs, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a qualified First Amendment right of public access attaches to a Rule 35 motion
• holding that the public and press have a right of access to various documents filed in connection with sentencing proceedings
• holding that the public and press have a right of access to various documents filed in connection with sentencing proceedings
• stating that only “legitimate, compelling interests may be asserted as a ground for closure” where the First Amendment supports a right of access
• stating that only “legitimate, compelling interests may be asserted as a ground for closure” where the First Amendment supports a right of access
• \Mandamus is the appropriate procedure for CBS to seek review of the orders denying it access to the sealed documents.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).