· 12/1/1992
C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States
Citations
- 978 F.2d 669
- 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,392
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32147
- 1992 WL 295620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the agreement between the contractor and the government to calculate a specific rate of additional home office overhead for certain contract modifications that extended the work performance period
- discussing the agreement between the contractor and the government to calculate a specific rate of additional home office overhead for certain contract modifications that extended the work performance period
- contractors can use Eichleay when disruption or delay has \cast a cloud of uncertainty over the length of the performance period of the contract\
- Eichleay formula inapplicable to home office overhead costs incurred by reason of a contract extension to perform additional work
- Eichleay formula inapplicable to home office overhead costs incurred by reason of a contract extension to perform additional work
- contractors can use Eichleay when disruption or delay has “cast a cloud of uncertainty over the length of the performance period of the contract”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rich, Cowen, Clevenger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.