Skip to main content
· 12/1/1992

C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States

Citations

  • 978 F.2d 669
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,392
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32147
  • 1992 WL 295620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the agreement between the contractor and the government to calculate a specific rate of additional home office overhead for certain contract modifications that extended the work performance period
  • discussing the agreement between the contractor and the government to calculate a specific rate of additional home office overhead for certain contract modifications that extended the work performance period
  • contractors can use Eichleay when disruption or delay has \cast a cloud of uncertainty over the length of the performance period of the contract\
  • Eichleay formula inapplicable to home office overhead costs incurred by reason of a contract extension to perform additional work
  • Eichleay formula inapplicable to home office overhead costs incurred by reason of a contract extension to perform additional work
  • contractors can use Eichleay when disruption or delay has “cast a cloud of uncertainty over the length of the performance period of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Cowen, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.