C.B. Fleet Company, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Healthcare, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Daubert application is to be “raised and resolved in the trial court” (citation omitted)
• holding that the district court did not clearly err in crediting one conflicting expert finding over another
• “[W]hether an advertising claim implicitly, though not expressly, asserts that it is test-validated must be considered a question of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).