Skip to main content
· 4/21/2011

CB Ex Rel. BB v. SPECIAL SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, MINNEAPOLIS

Citations

  • 636 F.3d 981
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8176
  • 2011 WL 1496485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing reimbursement where FAPE was not provided in timely manner and private placement was \proper.\
  • stating “parents of a child with a disability who previously received special education and related services must meet the twin requirements of Burlington to obtain reimbursement for expenditures on private special education”
  • \We review the district court's decision de novo. \
  • reviewing challenge to award of reimbursement of private school tuition
  • reviewing challenge to award of reimbursement of private school tuition
  • “We review the district court’s decision de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Smith, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.