Skip to main content
· 2/28/1989

Cazares v. Saenz

Citations

  • 208 Cal. App. 3d 279
  • 256 Cal. Rptr. 209
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying section 262 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts and acknowledging that it is a “specific type of impracticability of performance supplementing the general statement of the rule in section 261....”
  • parties had a fee allocation agreement
  • parties had a fee allocation agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.