Cazabat v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance, Kc99-544 (2001)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sentencing court's admonitions to defendant about dangers incident to decision to testify did not constitute \threat designed to scare off\ defendant from testifying
• holding that a sentence was substantively reasonable because the district court considered the defendant’s drug addiction but also considered his planning of the crime, his threats, and the need for deterrence
• holding court’s warning during sentencing was “a disclosure that educated Stile concerning the risks of his gambit, rather than as a threat designed to scare off a proposed witness in his defense”
• affirming denial of acceptance-of-responsibility adjustment, even though defendant had pleaded guilty, because defendant \obstructed the government's efforts to prosecute him\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).