Skip to main content
· 7/9/2015

Cavezza v. U.S. Department of Justice

Citations

  • 113 F. Supp. 3d 271
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff conceded the issues of the search and claimed exemptions where he neither contested the adequacy of the search nor “challenge[d] any of [the] redactions or the claimed exemptions”
  • “The agency must provide a detailed justification and not just conclusory statements to demonstrate that all reasonably segregable information has been released.” (internal quotation and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.