Skip to main content
· 12/16/2004

Caven v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Citations

  • 392 F.3d 1378
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26051
  • 2004 WL 2903039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in an increase in pay is not an appealable reduction in pay
  • explaining that the Board lacks jurisdiction over the denial of a promotion and the accompanying increase in pay
  • finding that the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in a pay increase is not an appealable reduction in pay
  • the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in a pay increase is not an appealable reduction in pay
  • the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in an increase in pay is not an appealable reduction in pay
  • the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in an increase in pay is not an appealable reduction in pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Friedman, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.