· 12/16/2004
Caven v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Citations
- 392 F.3d 1378
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26051
- 2004 WL 2903039
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in an increase in pay is not an appealable reduction in pay
- explaining that the Board lacks jurisdiction over the denial of a promotion and the accompanying increase in pay
- finding that the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in a pay increase is not an appealable reduction in pay
- the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in a pay increase is not an appealable reduction in pay
- the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in an increase in pay is not an appealable reduction in pay
- the denial of a promotion that would have resulted in an increase in pay is not an appealable reduction in pay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Friedman, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.