Cave v. Wetzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the district court did not err in ruling a pattern of hang-up telephone calls was disorderly conduct under the statute
• the district court did not err in concluding a pattern of hang-up telephone calls “served no purpose but to harass and intimidate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).