Cavcon, Inc. v. Endress+ Hauser, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a choice-of-law provision applied to a breach of contract claim, but not a claim for tortious interference or other tort or quasi-tort claims
• underscoring the well-established principle that no cause of action for breach of the duty of GFFD may lie where no breach of contract exists
• choice of law provision upheld inasmuch as “Indiana is the physical location of defendant Endress and is the state in which Endress is incorporated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).