Skip to main content
· 1/5/1996

Cavarretta v. Department of Children & Family Services

Citations

  • 660 N.E.2d 250
  • 214 Ill. Dec. 59
  • 277 Ill. App. 3d 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring use of preponderance standard so that the child protection agency and the subject “share the risk of error, rather than have the accused bear the brunt of the risk”
  • applying two-part test to determine whether plaintiff was deprived of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
  • requiring use of preponderance standard rather than credible evidence because of high risk of error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.