Cavanagh v. Oceanic Steamship Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant where plaintiff “identified no evidence that even suggests [defendant debt collector] called them in anything but a targeted manner”
• “[F]or a call to violate section 227(b)(1)(A), that call must employ either an ATDS’s capacity to use a random or sequential number generator to produce telephone numbers to be dialed or its capacity to use a random or sequential number generator to store telephone numbers to be dialed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).