Cavallaro v. Schimel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• signatures on the back side of petition signature sheet were held to be valid because petitions needed only be in substantial compliance with statutory authority
• signatures on the back side of petition signature sheet were held to be valid because petitions needed only be in substantial compliance with statutory authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cavallaro v. Nassau County Board of Elections
  New York Supreme Court· 2003-06-18· cited 1×
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2004-06-29
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2004-07-02
• Cavallaro v. Nassau County Bd. of Elections
  New York Supreme Court, Nassau County· 2003-06-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Frankel
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1925-03-13· cited 16×
• Cohalan v. Olmo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1973-04-09· cited 7×
• Clarkin v. Power
  New York Court of Appeals· 1960-06-02· cited 2×
• O'Connor v. McGivney
  New York Supreme Court· 1989-08-16· cited 2×
• Pisacane v. King
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-08-21· cited 1×