Causey v. Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the use of the word “automatically” in Bradfield has been “misconstrued.”
• noting that the use of the word “automatically” in Bradfield has been “misconstrued.”
• “ ‘[Wjhen there is a conflict of expert medical opinion, this Court has held it to be within the province of the fact-finder to determine the cause of death.’ ”
• “‘[W]hen there is a conflict of expert medical opinion, this Court has held it to be within the province of the fact- finder to determine the cause of death.’”
• “When considering a challenge to a jury instruction on appeal, we do not review jury instructions in isolation; rather, we read them as a whole to determine if the jury was properly instructed.” (internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).