Causey v. Grand Union Supermarkets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel”
• holding that “this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non- frivolous issues overlooked by counsel”
• holding that “this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel.”
• holding that we must “conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel”
• holding that without the notes of testimony from the guilty plea proceedings as part of the record, counsel could not have fulfilled his duty to review the entire record for any non-frivolous issues
• holding that, after determining counsel has satisfied the technical requirements of Anders and Santiago, this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are additional, non- -9- J-S84008-17 frivolous issues overlooked by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).