· 12/2/1965
Cauefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Citations
- 247 F. Supp. 851
- 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6121
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The undisputed evidence—specifically, the lack of 13 Plaintiff’s authorization and the satellite service at Defendant’s establishment—is sufficient to 14 establish Defendant’s unauthorized interception . . . via satellite service.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.