Skip to main content
· 12/2/1965

Cauefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Citations

  • 247 F. Supp. 851
  • 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The undisputed evidence—specifically, the lack of 13 Plaintiff’s authorization and the satellite service at Defendant’s establishment—is sufficient to 14 establish Defendant’s unauthorized interception . . . via satellite service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.