Caudle v. Bristow Optical Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Ninth 10 Circuit imposes a duty on plaintiffs seeking any form of back pay to mitigate damages
• holding “[w]e are aware of no 8 This is not to say that inaction can never constitute interference. See, e.g., Brea v. Heartland Exp., Inc. of Iowa, No. CV-11-00042-PHX-GMS, 2012 WL 3263966, at (D. Ariz. Aug. 9, 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).