Caudill v. Bernheim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the merits of an affirmative defense generally cannot be used to sustain a motion to dismiss
• finding that any further attempt to appeal refusal of coverage would have been futile under the circumstances after failing to respond to two requests for documents by the beneficiary
• stating there are “‘relatively rare circumstances where facts sufficient to rule on an affirmative defense are alleged in the complaint.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).