Caudell v. Toccoa Inn, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Maryland Rule 8-131(a) works to ensure that “‘(1) a proper record can be made with respect to the challenge, and (2) the other parties and the trial judge are given an opportunity to consider and respond to the challenge.’” (quoting Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 468 (2007)
• noting that Maryland Rule 8-131(a) works to ensure that “‘(1) a proper record can be made with respect to the challenge, and (2) the other parties and the trial judge are given an opportunity to consider and respond to the challenge.’” (quoting Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 468 (2007)
• to be preserved, “an issue simply needs to be ‘raised in or decided by the trial court,’ regardless of which party raises the issue”
• where a defendant advances one theory of suppression but fails to argue an additional theory that is later asserted on appeal, the defendant has “waived the right to have that claim litigated on direct appeal.”
• where a defendant advances one theory of suppression pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-252, but fails to argue an additional theory that it later asserts on appeal, the defendant has “waived the 7 right to have that claim litigated on direct appeal.”
• The purpose of Md. Rule 4-252 is “to alert both the court and the prosecutor to the precise nature of the complaint, in order that the prosecutor have a fair opportunity to defend against it and that the court understand the issue before it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).