Catsicas v. Catsicas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in rejecting appellant’s argument that a motion for extension amounted to a motion for rehearing, court observed that “[c]alling a cat a dog will not make it bark”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hernandez v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-11· cited 11×
• Olson v. Olson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-12· cited 6×
• Fuller v. Fuller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-28· cited 2×
• Rossi v. Ross
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-21· cited 1×
• Department of Revenue v. Cockerham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-16
• Mark Stucky and Mario Ceresa v. BMW of North America, LLC
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meyer v. Meyer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-18· cited 13×
• CLARA P. DIAMOND v. Tam-Bay Realty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-19· cited 12×
• Hosking v. Hosking
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-09-05· cited 8×
• Feinberg v. Feinberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-04· cited 4×
• Hyster Co. v. Morales
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-31· cited 2×