Skip to main content
· 3/20/1996

Catsicas v. Catsicas

Citations

  • 669 So. 2d 1126
  • 1996 WL 120972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in rejecting appellant’s argument that a motion for extension amounted to a motion for rehearing, court observed that “[c]alling a cat a dog will not make it bark”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.