Catron v. ROGER BOHN, DC, PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when statutory language is ambiguous, a court should consider whether an interpretation yields unreasonable results
• \[S]ection 766.102 and many other sections of chapter 766 are appalling in their lack of definition of critical terms and in their total lack of consistency in the manner of use and apparent meaning of those critical ... terms.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).