· 9/1/2006
Catron v. Citizens Union Bank
Citations
- 229 S.W.3d 54
- 2006 Ky. App. LEXIS 273
- 2006 WL 2523026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider issues that were not timely raised in appellant’s main brief
- “The reply brief is not a device for raising new issues which are essential to the success of the appeal.”
- ‘The reply brief is not a device for raising new issues which are essential to the success of the appeal.’
- an unpreserved issue raised for the first time in a reply brief cannot be considered on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Combs, Guidugli, Buckingham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.