CATOOSA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY v. STEVEN M. HENRY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an asylum claim based on general civil strife or random violence is not sufficient to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution
• recognizing that a claim based solely on general civil strife or widespread random violence is not sufficient to establish an objective fear of future persecution
• concluding that an asylum claim based on general civil strife or widespread random violence is not sufficient to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution
• concluding that an asylum claim based on general civil strife or random violence is not sufficient to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution
• holding that knife wounds sustained by petitioner during an Azeri attack on the Armenian residents of a border town was “an act of random vio- lence during a period of significant strife” despite a recognition “that old animosities between Azeris and Armenians still exist”
• determining petitioners did not show past persecution where they “did not establish that the [knife] attack was anything more than an act of random violence during a period of significant strife”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).