Skip to main content
· 3/30/2015

Cato v. Stephens

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 1704
  • 191 L. Ed. 2d 681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Petitioner’s argument that GESC may order corrective action only where employment decision based on one of specific enumerated factors, and emphasizing GESC’s jurisdiction to hear discrimination disputes based on any non-merit factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.