Cato v. PNC Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the disposition order “should have specified a commitment for one year, the maximum allowable sentence for this misdemeanor” (footnote omitted)
• re-sentencing required to specify commitment for one year, which was maximum allowable sentence, instead of commitment for “indeterminate period of time,” not longer than 19th birthday or maximum sentence allowable by law
• order committing juvenile to a level 8 program for “an indeterminate period of time, not longer than: a
• order committing juvenile to Level 8 program for indeterminate period of time was improper and should have specified a commitment for one year, the maximum allowable sentence for his misdemeanor
• order committing juvenile to Level 8 program for indeterminate period of time was improper and should have specified a commitment for one year, the maximum allowable sentence for his misdemeanor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).