Catlin v. Board of Registration of Architects

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party's substantial rights not prejudiced where administrative record \does not contain any information which might have produced a different result\
• party's substantial rights not prejudiced where administrative record \does not contain any information which might have produced a different result\
• board’s choice not to refer to particular piece of evidence in its decision does not imply failure to consider that evidence
• \The appealing party has the burden of showing that his 'substantial rights . . . may have been prejudiced' by the agency's error.\ (quoting Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 30A, § 14(7))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).